|
Andrew Rawnsley
SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR Penguin.2000. Revised 2001. ISBN-10: 0140278508 reviewed by Patrick Killough (1) biblio.com 08/3011 Would you recommend this book to other readers? * * Probably not. review: In the year 2000, English journalist Andrew Rawnsley issued SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR. It covered Prime Minister Tony Blair's British Labour Party's rule during its first three years in office, beginning in May 1997. The first edition of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE was in circulation before the end of Labour's first term. The very next year, 2001, Rawnsley produced a revised post-election edition, published by Penguin Books, including five new chapters and a largely reworked original text. Rawnsley carried the Labour government 13 months farther along, through the end of its first of three consecutive terms in office. In 2010 the author would round out his saga with THE END OF THE PARTY: THE RISE AND FALL OF NEW LABOUR. SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE (2nd edition) ends with Labour's first back-to-back national election victory in 101 years. Blair & Co. pulled off what no previous Labour Party ever did. "Old" Labour had been the party of equality for all and "down with privilege!" "New" Labour was the creation of four men, according to Rawnsley: Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell. They are the four "stars" of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE, though they interact with a cast of dozens of other. New Labour's goal was to change the direction of Britain from Conservatism to Progressivism in the 21st Century. Key issues were health care and education, reform of the House of Lords, devolution of power to Wales and Scotland and integration with Europe. Soon moving across the plates of Prime Minister Blair and Chancellor of the Exchequer Brown were, however, killings in Northern Ireland, a war in Kosovo, foot and mouth disease outbreaks, a unified European currency, the death of Princess Diana and much else besides. The second revised edition of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE is 568 pages long, of which xix pages go to a preface and introduction and 24 chapters and 508 pages are for narrative, hypothesizing, analyzing and commentary. There are no maps or charts. This is not history, but still dripping raw pre-history. Rawnsley, via off the record interviewing, pried open the tightly closed small inner circle of New Labour as no other British writer was doing. He may have been the first to identify the tightly concealed and ultimately fatal to New Labour rivalries between the Prime Minister and his Chancellor of the Exchequer. This book was a new approach, a semi-selective antidote to the then prevailing instant non-selective, non-verified "avalanche" reporting of every gossipy tidbit and scandal the tabloids could lay hands on or invent. Before SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE, a British government would be gone for ten or twenty years before its participants began to come clean in self-serving memoirs. SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR sprawls and rambles. Nothing stands out as more important than anything else. The Queen, whom Prime Ministers are supposed to advise and serve, comes across as one large, expensive, detached irrelevancy to Brtish life. We learn a fair amount about the Liberal Democratic party but little of the feckless Tories. Of Bill Clinton there is plenty: as early model to Tony Blair for media savvy and as later, distracted by l'affaire Lewinsky, requiring a wise Blair to build a fire under America over Kosovo. Bottom Line: I can think offhand of no friends to whom I can unconditionally commend this meandering, unfocused, often boring, shallow book. If you are mad for minutiae of fairly recent British politics, perhaps this book is for you. -OOO- http://www.biblio.com/books/382453039.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= (2) lunch.com 08/31/2011 name of review: By spinning facts, Britain's New Labour "created the truth." rating: * * * review: Are you the sort of person who cannot live one day from sunrise to bedtime without feeling driven to learn something new and gossipy about recent British politics -- no matter how bloody or at times boring an entrance that new knowledge makes? Then Andrew Rawnsley's SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR is unquestionably for you. Otherwise, you may skip this monstrously long (568 pages) paperback's "instant, undigested history" for something closer to your interests. NEW LABOUR is not repeat NOT for the general reader. Still, what reasonably attentive American reader has not heard of successive British Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown? Between them they led Britain's moribund, red flagged, labor union-subservient Labour party to three straight national electoral victories 1997, 2001 and 2005. 2001 was the first back-to-back victory for Labour in 101 years! In 2010 Labour under Gordon Brown finally ceded power to a coalition of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. New Labour's defeat after 13 continuous years in office is chronicled at even more exhaustive length (895 pages) in Rawnsley's recent (2010) THE END OF THE PARTY: THE RISE AND FALL OF NEW LABOUR. I fear that stubbornness and moderate curiosity will one day cause me to read and review that monster as well. SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE begins three years before Labour's 1997 victory. (Remember that Margaret Thatcher's Conservative/Tory party ruled Britain through four consecutive terms beginning in 1979 and still held power in 1994). In that year Thatcher's successor John Major was Prime Minister. The event that precipitated the creation and rise to power of New Labour was the sudden May 12,1994 death of Scottish lawyer John Smith, leader of the opposition Labour Party. Had Smith survived his heart attack and remained party leader, he would probably have led Labour to power in 1997, but not with the huge majority attributed to "the Blair effect." Tony Blair had entered Parliament, aged 30, in 1983, along with his more senior mentor and fellow Scot Gordon Brown. On July 21, 1994 Blair was elected Labour Party leader replacing the deceased John Smith. This begins the period covered by Rawnsley's SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE. Rawnsley adds two more men to his focus on New Labour's innermost circle: Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell. -- Dog-loving Mandelson, who replaced the
party's red flag with the red rose, was Labour's earliest and best
"spin doctor," all powerful "Prince of Darkness," an MP since 1992. He
was immediately part of the Gordon-Tony-Triumvirate within the party.
On the 1994 death of John Smith, Peter Mandelson suddenly shifted his
primary allegiance from Gordon Brown to Tony Blair, a betrayal that
Brown never forgave.
-- Journalist Alistair Campbell became Prime Minister Blair's Press Secretary in 1997 and later virtual and relentlessly centralizing czar within a Blair administration soon infamous for spinning the British media. Campbell saw to it that the "number of Whitehall press officers ... expanded to 1,100" (Ch. 19, p. 177). Meanwhile author Rawnsley was systematically interviewing generally unnamed sources while watching Blair, Mandelson and Campbell create New Labour, as the dour, more Old-Labor-at-heart Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown fiercely defended his ministerial independence and presented budgets focused on the needs of Britain's poor and disabled. Rawnsley biblically portrays "elder brother" Gordon Brown as "hairy Esau" tricked out of his inheritance by younger "smooth Isaac." And there they were -- New Labour's dual and dueling titans: Brown the down-to-earth, steady, reliable adminstrator and Blair the soaring, dreaming, flexi-pragmatist, vast admirer of America's Bill Clinton and, paradoxically, unpopular Brown's only friend in the Cabinet. Before Blair's New Labour, Old Labour's core was absolute opposition to all privilege, little if any love for Monarchy, much less for the House of Lords and not much for the middle class. Labour would rather lose an election than compromise on principle. Blair put it this way: "... we
have been out of power more often than in power, and won more arguments
than elections" (Ch. 18, p. 363).
But winning was everything for Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson. And that meant abandoning the red flag for the red rose, adapting the best free market ideas of Conservative Margaret Thatcher, and being more open to Europe. The working class longed to move up to the middle class and Blair was determined to help them rise. And also New Labour would stay in power by fingering the public's pulse through undending polling. Tony Blair lamented: "I have
taken from my party everything they thought they believed in. I have
stripped them of their core beliefs" (Ch. 11, p. 195).
And Mandelson and Campbell showed him how to do it. "Peter Mandelson ... unwisely revealed ... that the purpose of spin-doctoring was 'to create the truth'" (Ch. 6, p. 103). And what time those first four years -- 1997 - 2001 -- were for Blair, Brown, Mandelson and Campbell! Here there soon rolled in the death of Princess Diana, putting down violence in Northern Ireland, stiffening Bill Clinton's spine over Kosovo and Milosovic, mulling over a proper airplane for the Prime Minister ("Blair Force One?"), finding more money for education for the national health scheme, devolving power to Wales and Scotland, modernizing the House of Lords, manuevering in and out of European integration, marginalizing Labour back-benchers in Parliament, largely ignoring the Monarchy, coping tardily with a severe outbreak of foot and mouth disease and spinning, spinnning, ever spinning. It would have been a worthless exercise for me lazily to skim and skip about within Andrew Rawnsley's SERVANTS OFTHE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR. Doing this unwieldy book justice meant my slogging slowly and steadily along, filling 32 3" X 5" card front and back with notes and then writing five different book reviews. Oh, if ony Rawnsley or his editor had written an executive summary! For whatever else Andrew Rawnsley is, he is no "big picture" man. -OOO- http://www.lunch.com/Reviews/d/Andrew_Rawnsley _SERVANTS_OF_THE_PEOPLE_THE_INSIDE _STORY_OF_NEW_LABOUR-1750613.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= (3) bn.com 09/01/2011 title of review: It's easy to forget how much Prime Minister Tony Blair Did in his first Four Years rating: * * * review: If ever a book cried out for an Executive Summary (and did not have one) it is Andrew Rawnsley's Y2K SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDER STORY OF NEW LABOUR. In its first, rushed edition, NEW LABOUR followed the careers of and gossipy minutiae associated with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown through their first three years (1997 - 2000) running Great Britain. As he tells us in his revised 2001 and enlarged (five new chapters) edition, the fist edition SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE was already circulating before the 2001 elections. Rawnsley had been among the first "biblically" to detail the rivalry between onetime mentor Gordon Brown ("hairy Esau") and his younger former student ("smooth Jacob") Tony Blair. The second edition of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE focuses tightly on four leaders of New Labour, the innermost circle of movers and spinners: Prime Minister Tony Blair, Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, Blair's press secretary Alistair Campbell and the regime's greatest policy wonk and spin doctor, "Prince of Darkness" Peter Mandelson. Much of the 568 pages of my copy of the second edition goes to analyzing the psyches and angst of these four and other colleagues and the tendency of the Old and New factions within Britain's ruling Labour Party to ride off in all directions at once. It might be useful to a reader trying to make up her mind whether to read this large, rambling exercise in instant history to recall some of the challenges and positive achievements of the first four Blair-Brown years (1997 - 2001). Here are some: spinning the death of Princess Diana and reversing the plummet in the Queen's popularity; putting down violence in Northern Ireland; stiffening Bill Clinton's spine over Kosovo and Yugoslavia's murderous Slobodan Milosevic; mulling over a proper airplane for the Prime Minister ("Blair Force One?"); presiding over a prospering economy and finding more money for both education and for the national health scheme; simultaneously devolving real power to Wales and Scotland while introducing proportional representation there -- although not to UK-wide elections; modernizing the House of Lords; manuevering in and out of European integration, marginalizing Labour back-benchers in Parliament, largely ignoring the Monarchy and coping tardily with a severe outbreak of foot and mouth disease. What is the difference between Old Labour and Blair's New Labour? Britain's Labour party dates from 1900, a national grouping of the Left to represent unions and the growing urban proletariat. Its dominant ethos was fiercely egalitarian, anti-privilege, anti-middle class and anti-rich. Before Blair and Brown, Labour had never once won back-to-back national elections. But New Labour then won three in a row (1997, 2001 and 2005). Tony Blair's New Labour was a big tent that did not exclude the old egalitarian drives. Blair's lawyer wife Cherie was one of thousands who were anti-monarchy. In the 2001 campaign Tony Blair threatened to abolish all hereditary member of the House of Lords (he did reduce their number by 650 to 96). But New Labour's "newness" was to realize that the working class wanted to become middle class and that a privatized free enterprise economy after the fashion of Tory Margaret Thatcher was the ticket to realizing that goal. Unless you are already immersed in recent British politics, SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE is a tough read. No one issue stands out. You will learn a fair amount about the Liberal-Democrats but little of the Conservatives. It is easy to get lost in a forest of details and gossip. This is not a big picture book. And I am not sure if its author, Andrew Rawnsley, is the right person to draft the badly needed 10-page Executive Summary. -OOO- http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/servants-of-the-people -rawnsley/1004758588?ean=9780140278507&itm=3&usri =andrew%2brawnsley =-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= (4) amazon.com09/02/2011 title of review: Britain's New Labour Party Spared the House of Lords rating: * * * review: Regarding my second edition copy of Andrew Rawnsley's SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR, I have just read all six reviews posted at amazon.com as of Friday September 02, 2011. I learned useful slants from all six reviews, spread equally between 5-star and 4-star ratings. I infer that all or most of the reviewers are British. Certainly all give every appearance of knowing first-hand and far better than American I the day by day workings of British politics since 1994. That is the year when the unexpected death in May of Labour Party chief John Smith catapulted Tony Blair to elected party leaderahip in July. I sincerely doubt that most American general readers with an educated but selective knowledge of British politics since 1994 would rate SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE higher than 3-star or 2-star. Why? -- (1) The author generally declines to
EMPHASIZE any one event more strongly than another. Everything is
equally important or trivial. He leaves it to the reader to sort the
wheat from the chaff. The exception is the unrelenting drumbeat of spin
doctoring: New Labour biggies apparently never met a fact they wouldn't
spin.
-- (2) Andrew Rawnsley nor his editor provides a badly needed Executive Summary. What, after all, were the major challenges faced by and achievements of New Labour's first of three watches at the tiller (1997 - 2001)? To this detached American, these would appear to include at least the following: spinning the death of Princess Diana to the advantage of a media-deaf Queen; and helpfully reversing the reluctance to go to war over Kosovo and Yugoslavia's murderous Slobodan Milosevic; presiding over a prospering economy and finding more money than the Tories had both for education and for the national health scheme; devolving real power to Wales and Scotland while simultaneously introducing proportional representation there -- although not to UK-wide elections; modernizing the House of Lords; manuevering in and out of European integration, marginalizing Labour back-benchers in Parliament, largely ignoring the feckless Monarchy and coping tardily with a severe outbreak of foot and mouth disease. -- (3) Low-key humor there is indeed in SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE, just not as much as, say, in Major General Lionel Dunsterville's recently re-issued memoirs: STALKY'S REMINISCENCES. Was there really a media brouhaha over the proper form of air transport for the PM: ("Blair Force One")? -- (4) I think that my six predecessor reviewers for amazon.com have done justice to other workmanlike elements at play in the narrative of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: the ultimately fatal fraternal dueling between pupil Tony Blair - mentor Gordon Brown ("smooth Jacob" versus "hairy Esau," as Rawnsley so biblically put it); the psychological makeup of New Labour's inner circle, including Peter "Prince of Darkness" Mandelson and press czar Alistair Campbell under whom the "number of Whitehall press officers ... expanded to 1,100" ; the important distinction between New Labour as Project and as Governing body; and much more. So what does that leave for less informed me to review? Just for fun, let me select at random two themes for a bit larger consideration. -- Let's begin with New Labour's "Project"
for the House of Lords and
what actually happened. From scattered passages of SERVANTS OF THE
PEOPLE I gather, perhaps not entirely accurately, that at a party
conference after the May 1997 Parliamentarly election (or was it
before?) Blair re-pledged to put the hereditary lords "to the sword" (Ch. 11, p. 203).
Somewhere I also got the impression that Blair & Co. had originally
announced the intention to do so sometime BEFORE the election. Well,
did he? Or did
an earlier Labour Project to do away entirely with the Lords give way
to elastically pragmatic Blair's settling for mere "reform?"
Must I google for that information, or is it clearly stated somewhere
in the book and I just missed it, despite combing jejune references in
the Index? In the event, after clever negotiations which spared the
House of Commons a wasted year muscling its way into reform, New Labour
soon enough reduced the hereditary lords by 650 (p. 203). How many
hereditaries did that leave: 92?
-- Another theme that my better informed fellow reviewers might care to address is, with so many anti-Monarchists in the Labour Party (including, if I recall correctly, the Prime Minister's lawyer wife Cherie), why is Britain still not a republic? Were the Cromwells, father and son, simply two Republicans too many? In the cases of both the Lords and the Monarchy, did Blair go no farther than the polls told him that the British electorate wanted to go? On balance, I found reading SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR a slow, tough slog. I learned little new about the Conservative Party than I already knew, although much more about the Liberal-Democrats in 1997 and afterwards. Downward evolution of the Tony Blair - Bill Clinton romance held my attention. But, had there been a decent 10-page Executive Summary, I would have contented myself with that rather than 568 pages of prosing. -OOO- http://www.amazon.com/Servants-People-Andrew-Rawnsley/ dp/0140278508/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid= 1310910237&sr=1-1 =-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= (5) epinions.com 09/03/2011 Review Title: "I have taken from my party everything they thought they believed in" -- Tony Blair. Product Rating: * * * PROS: 1997 - 2001: First Term of Britain's Tony Blair. History was in the making. CONS: Long: 568 pages. Unfocused: nothing stands out. Cries out for an executive summary. BOTTOM LINE: Many British readers have thoroughly enjoyed SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE. I doubt that this is true of any Americans without a passion for recent (1994 - 2001) British politics. aohcapablanca's Full Review: A few months ago I was presented, in appreciation of a talk I had given to a women's group, a copy of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's political memoir of 2010, A JOURNEY. Not caring much for the gift once I had read it, I then, perhaps stupidly, followed one critic's advice and acquired two consecutive studies by journalist Andrew Rawnsley of Tony Blair and his "New Labour" movement. Why? Because, I had been advised by a learned critic that I would thereby make more sense of far from insignificant Tony Blair than Blair had just made of himself. I have now finished the first gigantic tome but have not yet looked at the second study by Rawnsley. I feared more than once that I would never finish Andrew Rawnsley's 2000 (2nd revised edition 2001) SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR. It was July 15 when I began filling with notes, front and back, the first of 32 3" X 5" cards. It is September 03 as I type this review. Stubbornly, I slogged slowly and diligently through to the intensely welcomed end: 568 pages, of which xix pages go to a preface and introduction and then come 24 chapters (five of them new) and 508 pages of narrating, hypothesizing, analyzing and commenting. There are no maps or charts. What made SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE unappealing to me? At bottom, I think, because the study of Britain's Labour Party from 1994 - 2001 was written only for very well informed British readers, not at all for most Americans. In 2000 (Y2K) British readers were only a third of the way through the sequential regimes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. New Labour was the air they breathed. -- Britons needed no background history of
the Labour Party from its founding in 1900.
-- Brits did not have to be told that before Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and spinmasters Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell (the Big Four of New Labour, according to Andrew Rawnsley) the Labour party had always been the implacable, inflexible enemy of privilege, income inequality, the House of Lords and at times of the Monarchy itself. -- Brits did not require a "big picture" 10-page Executive Summary of the New Labour "Project" that Blair & Co. brought to Whitehall in 1997, or a sketch of the unexpected events that threw them off stride towards what they had promised to do and what they actually managed to accomplish during their first four years ruling Britain. But all of the above, I judge, normal Americans do need! And there exists no American edition of SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDE STORY OF NEW LABOUR tailored to Americans. Andrew Rawnsley, to put things bluntly, did not write for American general readers with no more knowledge than they had picked up on the fly of British politics since 1994. That was the year that Labour's leader John Smith died and Tony Blair became Leader of the Opposition. That non-existent tailored American edition I can imagine as being solidly average or even much better. But both a first (2000) as well as a second (2001) British edition studiously ignoring American needs (for history, Executive Summary, maps, etc.) is not, I fear, going to be worth the time and effort an American will want to contribute in order to mine the scattered nuggets of insight, analysis and humor that Andrew Rawnsley without question does offer. All that having been rather testily said, what might I personally offer an American reader by way of a review? -- (1) A bit of historical background
Founded in 1900, Britain's Labour Party was the champion of urban working people and labor unions. Labourites fought privilege, whether of the Crown, aristocracy or merely of the middle class. They won national elections now and then but never two in a row. By 1997 The Tories, under Margaret Thatcher and then John Major, had won four elections in succession, beginning in 1979. Thatcher had dismantled much of the nationalizing of industry done by Labour and promoted a freer economy. By 1997 Labour was hungry for victory and Tony Blair was especially so. He argued: "...we have been out of power more often than in power, and won more arguments than elections" (Ch. 18). Blair would transform Old Labour into New Labour -- from Left Radical to Center Left. And win! Later he would admit: "I have taken from my party everything they thought they believed in. I have stripped them of their core beliefs. ... What keeps it together is success and power" (Ch. 11). -- (2) A three paragraph sketch
towards an Executive Summary of key challenges and successes of Tony
Blair's first four (of ten) years as British First Minister
What surprises and opportunities had Fate in store for New Labour? How did Blair & Co. respond? Which of "the Project's" preplanned policies went forward to what extent? Recall the sudden death of Princess Diana and how the media-deaf Queen reacted; Tony Blair's almost single-handedly reversing Europe's and America's reluctance to go to war over Kosovo; Blair's presiding skilfully with Gordon Brown over a prospering economy and finding more money than the Tories had done both for education and for the national health scheme; devolving real internal powers to Wales and Scotland while simultaneously introducing proportional representation there -- although not permitting it in UK-wide elections; modernizing the House of Lords; manuevering in and out of European integration, marginalizing Labour back-benchers in Parliament, making the Bank of England an independent power, largely ignoring the feckless Monarchy and coping tardily, clumsily and expensively with a severe outbreak of foot and mouth disease. That outbreak proved "ten
times worse than the outbreak of the sixties, and worse than other
outbreak anywhere in the world ever" (Ch. 23).
In Rawnsley's considered judgment, by the end of Labour's third year in power (May 2000) New Labour had proven not to be anything like a bad government -- there had been no major catastrophes -- in places a good one but not yet a great government. For that to occur Labour must master its own factions, especially the cornerstone but fatal mating of Tony Blair with his onetime mentor Gordon Brown. Brown was a superior Chancellor of the Exchequer and master of economic policy. This power allowed the Chancellor to veto virtually at will soaring schemes of the idealistic Prime Minister. -- (3) Rawnsley's Sense of Humor or at
least Irony
I don't think that Andrew Rawnsley is himself a writer of orginal jokes. But he has an ear for those of others and uses them to illustrate a point. Someone, for instance, in the media, when Tony Blair seemed to be looking for ways to act more like an American President, wondered if he would be transported around Britain and the world in "Blair Force One" (Ch. 4). Of his perennially in hot water advisor Peter Mandelson, Tony Blair once wished that Peter would take Tony's advice as eagerly as Tony took Peter's. At the height of the foot and mouth disease crisis, a calf named Phoenix rose from her slaughtered mother's side and caught the nation's fancy. New Labour's decision to spare Phoenix's life was a crowd pleaser and also led to a change of policy. "The Phoenix story was the more nauseous when all else was carnage. ... Thus might the prime Minister who had presided over the mass slaugher of more than two million cattle, pigs, sheep and lambs be projected as the saviour of the calf that had melted the heart of the nation" (Ch. 23). When wife Cherie became pregnant, Blair learned that some Britons acted surprised that their 40-something Prime Minister still had sex. -- (4) Some detail
regarding an issue or two: New Labour versus Old Labor on the Lords and
the Monarch.
Old Labour was first and foremost the champion of the little fellow, and Chancellor Gordon Brown always put the poor and the disabled first in the budgets he crafted. Old Labour had long yearned either to abolish the House of Lords or at least to remove all its hereditary members, over 700 of them. Tony Blair promised to do the latter but in the end only did away with 650 of them, leaving 92 hereditary lords and ladies. Old Labour always had a strong Republican, anti-Monarchical component. Even Tony Blair's lawyer wife Cherie was Republican. Yet Tony Blair quickly grew fond of Queen Elizabeth II and left to some future Prime Minister the chore of ending the British Monarchy. There is much, much more in SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: the Millennium Dome, rescue of British troops held hostage in Sierra Leone, the shock of George W. Bush's victory over New Labour's darling ecologist Al Gore, the arrests of Chile's former dictator Augusto Pinochet and also of "purer than pure" Tony Blair's 16-year old son for drunkenness, psychological analyses of all the principal characters of New Labour and on and on. One question remains: was learning all this worth the time and effort that I put into it? My personal answer is no. And, no, I would not recommend SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE: THE INSIDER STORY OF NEW LABOUR to any American whom I call my friend. And I would think twice before commending it to an English or Scottish chum either. For Americans I rank SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE at 2.5 stars, rounding charitably up to 3.0 stars. -OOO- p.s. I thank you PestySide Patsy for making this book available for review within epinions.com http://www.epinions.com/review/Andrew_Rawnsley_Servants _of_the_People_The_Inside_Story_of_ New_Labour_epi/content_562777001604 =-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= rawnsley_newlabour http://www.patrickkillough.com/books/rawnsley_newlabour.html |