FOREIGN POLICY:
NOT JUST FOR YOU
BUT BY YOU AS WELL

Second Session:

DEMOCRATIC POLICY 1640 - 1920

(1)  England 1640 - 1660: The People Demand to Be Heard.

The prolog to American participatory (domestic) policy-making was spoken and written in England (and to an extent in North America as well) 1640 - 1660. At that time Parliament created the New Model Army to defeat King Charles I. That army was drawn from a broad spectrum of free men and was responsive to ideas proposed by radical writings of men like John Lilburne, John Amos Comenius, Abiezer Coppe, George Fox, Thomas Hobbes, John Saltmarsh and Gerrard Winstanley. Englishmen were infused by the inner light, the sense of the meeting and of Christ rising in the sons and daughters of God. Parliament had rallied the common people against the King. But Parliament could not dismiss the people's army once the people demanded more than the landowners were willing to grant.

John Saltmarsh succinctly made the case for policy being made not merely for  the people but by  the people as well:

       ... the interest of the people in Christ's kingdom is not only an interest of ...                 submission but of consultation, of debating, counselling, prophesying, voting.
        (Christopher Hill (1972) THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN, 47 , n. 10.)

The common people of England lost: first to the future Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell and then to the restored Stuart kings. But the demand by the people to help make policy would be repeated by Englishmen more forcefully in the friendlier air of North America.

(2)  American Secession From Britain. The French Alliance.

Britain's non-consultative way of raising imperial revenues provoked secession in 1776 by 13 north American colonies. The rebels' first foreign alliance, with France, defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown in 1781. The new Federal Government of 1789 inherited from the Confederation the French Alliance. This included an obligation to  protect France's island possessions in the Caribbean. America soon split into Hamiltonian (pro-British) and Jeffersonian (pro-French) parties.

(3)  The Federalists. Washington's Farewell Address.

In 1796 George Washington announced that he would not stand for a third term as President of the United States. His Farewell Address, largely drafted by Alexander Hamilton, urged America to have as little political connection as possible with any other nation. National emergencies might call for alliances. But alliances must be temporary, never permanent. This "testament" was the first authoritative statement of America's independent foreign policy. It was non-consultative in origin.


(4) The 1799 Logan Act: "Private Hands Off Foreign Policy!"

In 1798 Dr George Logan, prominent Quaker of Philadelphia, went to Paris on a private mission to head off war. For his pains he was snubbed by former President Washington, rebuked by Secretary of State Timothy Pickering and had a dubious, repressive Federal law named for him. That law punishes with fines and imprisonment any American who corresponds without official authorization with a foreign government on a matter in dispute with the United States. This law remains on the books, though it has never been successfully enforced.

The Convention of Mortefontaine which averted war with France was innovative. For the three person delegation which negotiated the agreement was led by Oliver Ellsworth, erstwhile Chief Justice of the United States, supported by William Davie, outgoing Governor of North Carolina.


(5)  1898 War with Spain. Senators, Journalist Negotiate Peace.

The "splendid little war" of 1898 rewarded the U.S. with Cuba (temporarily), Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Guam. Republican President William McKinley ended that war through a non-traditional negotiating team. Peace Commission leader was outgoing Secretary of State Judge William Day, aided by former Minister to Britain, then then private citizen, Whitelaw Reid of the the New York TRIBUNE plus three U.S. Senators: George Gray, (D) of Delaware and Republicans Cushman Davis of Minnesota and William Frye of Maine.


(6) League of Nations.  1919  - 1920: Wilson Loses in the Senate.

President Wilson's approach to a post World War I globe was innovative. Private persons and groups in both America and the United Kingdom contributed mightily to the ideas and debates leading to the conception of the League of Nations. Individual experts from outside government, mainly from academia, worked as a semi-secret planning team called "The Inquiry."  But the Peace Commission, which Wilson personally led included no Senators as negotiators and was barely bipartisan. In both 1919 and early 1920 the President failed to persuade the U.S. Senate to permit U.S. membership in the League.

In 1906 former President Theodore Roosevelt had publicly advocated "a League of Peace" with members policing themselves and, if necessary, using force against non-members intending to break the peace. Roosevelt's speech materials had been provided by Hamilton Holt, editor of THE INDEPENDENT. Holt, Theodore Marburg and leaders of the New York Peace Society then creted a popular movement to think through and support a world organization along the lines of the 18th Century American Articles of Confederation.

In June 1915 the private "League to Enforce Peace" was officially launched, chaired by former Presdident William Howard Taft. This was America's largest early movement to educate the people in foreign affairs. The movement's early leadership was overwhelmingly Republican. This changed in May 1916 when Democratic President Woodrow Wilson spoke in support of League objectives. In 1916 both Presidential candidates advocated a post-war league. Yet Wilson's domestic political mistakes kept the Senate from approving U.S. membership in a small "l" league of nations which up to 80% of Americans wanted.

-OOO-



-OOO-

presented orally 07/18/1993
revisited and edited lightly for internet 03/26/2004

Patrick Killough
Black Mountain, NC