WHO WILL LEAD
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
AFTER NOVEMBER 2000:
Tom Sobol or Nathan Ramsey?
by Patrick Killough
[07/12/2000]
On June 22 Tom Sobol, grizzled
Democratic candidate for re-election as
County Chairman, defended
his record before a business group in Asheville.
Also in the ring was
his young Republican challenger: accountancy-trained
lawyer and dairyman, Nathan
Ramsey. Each made a case that he is the better
man to become
the next Chairman of the Buncombe County Board of
Commissioners.
Nathan Ramsey
Nathan Ramsey spoke first,
citing his undergraduate degree in accounting.
On budget and tax matters
he shone. County debt has risen 400% in 12
years. Property taxes seem
likely to rise 8% a year. The county is more
heavily taxed than it need
or should be and more than similar North
Carolina counties. Its
budget relies too much on an uncommitted fund
balance meant only for emergencies.
Ramsey also hammered away at Chairman
Sobol's recent rebuke by
voters in a referendum rejecting zoning. It was
Nathan's success in leading
the anti-zoning forces that had propelled him
into becoming a believable
challenger to the battle-scared veteran Sobol.
Ramsey's accounting skills
now probe for every tiny chink in the
Chairman's armor. On other
issues, however, such as economic development
Ramsey does not yet sound
like a leader.
But then neither does Tom
Sobol. Both seem clueless about high paying jobs:
how to retain those
already here and how to attract new ones.
Tom Sobol
Current county chairman Tom
Sobol is an experienced if weary manager,
putting in 35-40 hour weeks
in a low-paid, essentially volunteer position. He is hands-on, down in
the trenches. Tom focuses on delivering services to people who need them
most. He is proud that 81.2% of the county budget goes to human needs--a
percentage which Ramsey finds excessive. Sobol believes that the
health of every child in the county is now being addressed better than
elsewhere. Nonetheless, Sobol
foresees a looming, inescapable
crisis in mental health care funding. He admits that county government
is more complex and its problems more intractable than he had imagined
when he went into politics nearly two decades ago. Alas for Sobol: "What
will be will be" is not a promise likely to win an election.
Nathan Ramsey, too, was better
at noticing problems and pointing to the
Chairman's weaknesses than
at suggesting what he would do differently or
better.
Both candidates are superior
problem identifiers. But Tom seems tired and
not really (despite protests
otherwise) looking forward to ever new, ever
bigger challenges.
Nathan, by contrast, is energetic,
self-confident and eager to try his
hand. That youthful energy
just might be enough to push the contender over
the top. For CountyChairman
should be an early stage in a political
career, not some
Mount Everest to sit around year after year gloating that one conquered
it. Nathan's challenge is to convince voters that "Ramsey will
do more for Buncombe County." That candidate will win in November
who persuades voters that he and he alone will solve the big tough problems--beginning
with inducing great companies to invest here in Buncombe County.
-OOO-
for INDEPENDENT TORCH
[NOTE: Nathan Ramsey, the
young challenger, narrowly won the November 2000 political contest. He
sits as the only Republican among otherwise Democratic Commissioners of
Buncombe County, NC. TPK 06/24/2001]
.
|